Skip to main content

Microsoft hacks back: Fancy Bear D0wn

What could be the best way to take over and disrupt cyber espionage campaigns?

Hacking them back?

Probably not. At least not when it's Microsoft, who is continuously trying to protect its users from hackers, cyber criminals and state-sponsored groups.

It has now been revealed that Microsoft has taken a different approach to disrupt a large number of cyber espionage campaigns conducted by "Fancy Bear" hacking group by using the lawsuit as a tool — the tech company cleverly hijacked some of its servers with the help of law.

Microsoft used its legal team last year to sue Fancy Bear in a federal court outside Washington DC, accusing the hacking group of computer intrusion, cybersquatting, and reserving several domain names that violate Microsoft's trademarks, according to a detailed report published by the Daily Beast.

Fancy Bear — also known as APT28, Sofacy, Sednit, and Pawn Storm — is a sophisticated hacking group that has been in operation since at least 2007 and has also been accused of hacking the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Clinton Campaign in an attempt to influence the U.S. presidential election.

The hacking group is believed to be associated with the GRU (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate), Russian secret military intelligence agency, though Microsoft has not mentioned any connection between Fancy Bear and the Russian government in its lawsuit.

Instead of registering generic domains for its cyber espionage operations, Fancy Bear often picked domain names that look-alike Microsoft products and services, such as livemicrosoft[.]net and rsshotmail[.]com, in order to carry out its hacking and cyber espionage campaigns.

This inadvertently gave Microsoft an opportunity to drag the hacking group with "unknown members" into the court of justice.

Microsoft Sinkholed Fancy Bear Domains


The purpose of the lawsuit was not to bring the criminal group to the court; instead, Microsoft appealed to the court to gain the ownership of Fancy Bear domains — many of which act as command-and-control servers for various malware distributed by the group.

"These servers can be thought of as the spymasters in Russia's cyber espionage, waiting patiently for contact from their malware agents in the field, then issuing encrypted instructions and accepting stolen documents," the report reads.
Although Microsoft did not get the full-ownership of those domains yet, the judge last year issued a then-sealed order to domain name registrars "compelling them to alter" the DNS of at least 70 Fancy Bear domains and pointing them to Microsoft-controlled servers.

Eventually, Microsoft used the lawsuit as a tool to create sinkhole domains, allowing the company's Digital Crimes Unit to actively monitor the malware infrastructures and identify potential victims.
"By analyzing the traffic coming to its sinkhole, the company’s security experts have identified 122 new cyber espionage victims, whom it’s been alerting through Internet service providers," the report reads.
Microsoft has appealed and is still waiting for a final default judgment against Fancy Bear, for which the hearing has been scheduled on Friday in Virginia court.
Source: HackerNews

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

‘Infraud’ Cybercrime Forum is Busted, 13 hackers arrested & 36 charged

The U.S. Justice Department announced charges on Wednesday against three dozen individuals thought to be key members of ‘ Infraud ,” a long-running cybercrime forum that federal prosecutors say cost consumers more than a half billion dollars. In conjunction with the forum takedown, 13 alleged Infraud members from the United States and six other countries were arrested. Started in October 2010, Infraud was short for “In Fraud We Trust,” and collectively the forum referred to itself as the “Ministry of Fraudulently [sic] Affairs.” As a mostly English-language fraud forum, Infraud attracted nearly 11,000 members from around the globe who sold, traded and bought everything from stolen identities and credit card accounts to ATM skimmers, botnet hosting and malicious software. “Today’s indictment and arrests mark one of the largest cyberfraud enterprise prosecutions ever undertaken by the Department of Justice,” said John P. Cronan , acting assistant attorne

Czech Republic announced it had extradited the Russian hacker Yevgeni Nikulin (29) to the United States

Yevgeni Nikulin (29) was requested by the US for alleged cyber attacks on social networks and by the Russian authorities that charged him with frauds. According to US authorities, the man targeted LinkedIn and Formspring and hacked into the file hosting service Dropbox. The Russian criminal was arrested in Prague in October 2016 in an international joint operation with the FBI. The case in the middle of an arm wrestling between Moscow and Washington, the US Government are accusing Russia to have interfered with 2016 Presidential election  through hacking . Source: US Defense Watch.com In May, a Czech court ruled that Nikulin can be extradited to either Russia or the United States, leaving the final decision to the Justice Minister Robert Pelikan. “It is true there have been two meetings this year where the president asked me not to extradite a Russian citizen to the United States but to Russia,” the website of the weekly newspaper Respekt quoted Pelikan as sayin

NanoCore developper busted and senteced for 33 months

  A hacker who was arrested and pleaded guilty last year—not because he hacked someone, but for creating and selling a remote access trojan that helped cyber criminals—has finally been sentenced to serve almost three years in prison. Taylor Huddleston, 26, of Hot Springs, Arkansas, pleaded guilty in July 2017 to one charge of aiding and abetting computer intrusions by building and intentionally selling a remote access trojan (RAT), called NanoCore , to hackers for $25. Huddleston was arrested in March, almost two months before the FBI raided his house in Hot Springs, Arkansas and left with his computers after 90 minutes, only to return eight weeks later with handcuffs.   This case is a rare example of the US Department of Justice (DOJ) charging someone not for actively using malware to hack victims' computers, but for developing and selling it to other cybercriminals. Huddleston admitted to the court that he created his software knowing it would be used